The Old Matelot



matelot;
noun,
sailor; from the French mat-el-oh (plural matelots)
A slang expression, chiefly in Britain, may also mean mate or companion.

Welcome to the Old Matelots' blog, my first (and probably last!) journalistic endeavour. Watch its development and evolution as I make the transition into retirement and the live-aboard, off the grid lifestyle on the sailing yacht, Circe. Follow my fortunes (and misfortunes) in the posts as I work to rehabilitate my home on the water.

UPDATE - Due major back-to-back relationship and health issues during 2017 & 2018 I was involuntarily beached and forced to let Circe go. The blog will remain up for the foreseeable future for informational benefit to other owners of these magnificent boats.


*******************************************************************************************************************************************************************


2011-04-27

Shower Grate

The design of the B-Plan Freeport includes a large combination head and shower compartment in the forward  part of the boat. To facilitate drainage of the area when the shower is in use a large teak grate is provided in the floor, with a collection sump below it. The size of the grate is such that it essentially covers the whole floor of the head compartment. 

While it adds an aesthetically attractive, traditional element to the compartment, the teak grate is not very practical. It enthusiasticaly collects dirt, hair and other debris that falls onto it, the holes in it are big enough that fairly large items can drop through into the sump and, being square, the holes are difficult to keep clean. As an added bonus, periodic maintenance in the form of oiling or varnishing the wood is needed.





Here is a view of the collection sump under the grate and the outlet to the sump pump. To minimise flexing of the grate under load a central 'bridge' is molded in to give some support to the narrow, forward part of the grate. Strangely, the designer didn't think it necessary to support the wider, high traffic, high load area between the head and the wash basin and, predictably that part of the grate flexes the most. Also, there is no grille or cover at the  sump outlet to stop debris being washed down into the pump. 
   












As a first step to improving things we picked up a cheap tub drain grille to protect the sump outlet.
















A general view of the sump with the grille removed....final resting place for trapped hair, lint and errant caps from cosmetic containers and toothpaste tubes!










In addition to the various functional shortcomings in the original grate design, our particular one was suffering other problems. Largely due to general wear and tear, with a little neglect thrown in, our grate was starting to come apart. A big problem was that the underside of the grate appeared to have received no teak treatment, oil or varnish, since it was made! The top face looked like it had been oiled periodically but the unprotected  raw wood surfaces on the bottom had been soaking water for decades, thus causing the joint failures and distortion.






This shot shows some of the worst open joints on the side of the grate closest to the head. The lattice work grate design is produced with  approximately 90 dado joints, all secured with some sort of glue but no mechanical fasteners. A quick and cheap assembly process for the builder but not very durable for an item that will be subjected to a lot of flexing.











This shot shows the screws that  we put in as a first temporary repair. Within a couple of weeks, however, more joints were failing and the whole grate was becoming rickety and noisy.....squeaking and groaning even with our modest avoirdupois! It was also getting very tight and difficult to remove from it's recess due to the distortion.











This side-shot shows how the grate was also deformed at the narrowest end as a result of the looseness and flexing.

(No extra points for noticing that the cap rail varnish is shot.....its on the list!)









We spent a little time looking at ways of possibly repairing the grate but decided that the time and cost really didn't make sense, bearing in mind the other fundamental shortcomings of the design, so.....a completely new approach was needed.

Enter the hero of our tale, Todd the Maintenance Tech. from the sailing school here at the marina. "Why not make a new one from a piece of Starboard?" he said. Well, after a couple of nanoseconds of deliberation we agreed: "Why not indeed?" Todd managed to rustle up a suitable off-cut of 3/4 inch, non-skid textured starboard-like material in a light gray colour and we set to work.

Using the teak grate as a template it was easy to transfer the shape to the polymer. A few minutes with the sabre saw and belt sander and we had our blank. A couple of trial fits and adjustments with the belt sander and we were ready to router the edges. We finished it with about one sixteenth inch clearance all round for easy installation.







Here is the old and the new side by side. 















We had originally planned for some drainage holes or slots but decided to test it for drainage without them........surprise, surprise, it seems to drain just fine with nothing but the edge clearances. If we find the drainage is inadequate in service it will be easy to add some holes or slots as necessary.













A recessed finger pull in one corner makes for easy removal and cleaning.







While Freeport originalists and purists may shudder, this new polymer floor panel was very inexpensive and is very easy to clean. It flexes less than the teak grate, it doesn't creak, it requires no maintenance and it will not swallow toothpaste tube caps! We briefly considered using white material, which would have worked (boring), but went with gray as the contrast looks good and hides marks better. Another project checked off the list........funny how that list never seems to get much shorter?


2011-04-14

Freeport Spec. Changes

The Robert Perry designed Freeport 36 was built by Islander Yachts between 1977 and 1984 with the bulk of production being between 1978 and 1980. Freeports were offered with two interior layouts; the A-Plan, with a forward v-berth and port side head/shower, or the B-Plan with a forward head/shower and a raised ‘Pullman‘ berth on the port side, mid-ship. Approximately 155 boats were built, with the B-Plan layout by far the most popular. 

We Old Matelots bought our 1982 Freeport, Circe (B-Plan, hull #147), in the summer of 2010 and since then we have been working hard to get her to our ideal set-up. As we have repaired, replaced, upgraded, improved and generally got to know Circe more intimately we have become aware of numerous significant changes to the boat’s specifications that occurred during the production run. By talking to other Freeport owners and looking at their boats, blogs, records and photographs and comparing them to Circe it appears that most of the major changes occurred after 1980. Almost all the changes seem to have been directed toward cost reduction and, in our opinion, diminished what was originally a very comprehensive specification. The 1978 and 1979 boats appear to have had the best specification for the marque and, seemingly, were built to the highest standard. From our experience and observations, the build quality deteriorated quite markedly after 1981 as the 36F production run was slowing and the factory focus shifted to the short lived 38C. Some evidence of this quality shortfall can be seen in the Horror Gallery elsewhere on the Blog. After 1980, many previously standard features either became up-charge options or disappeared completely. Here, in no particular order, are some of the changes we have seen between the pre and post 1980 boats:

  • Fixed companionway steps, with hinged treads for easy access to integrated storage under, were eliminated. Replaced by detachable ladder with smaller & less accessible storage.
  • Drawer, cupboard & cutting board eliminated from forward galley counter. Replaced with a louvre door and plain shelves.
  • Separate, independent fridge & freezer compartments eliminated. Replaced with single large ice box. (compressor/holding plate available as up-charge option.) 
  • Access door eliminated from dinette into the forward galley under-counter storage space.
  • Access eliminated to storage area under the range/stove.
  • Side slides eliminated from all drawers in the boat. Replaced with wooden center runners.
  • Contoured teak pulls eliminated from cupboard doors above sofa and dinette. Replaced with finger notches in edge of cupboard doors. Hinges moved from bottom of  doors  to sides. 
  • Contoured teak pulls eliminated from all drawers in the boat. Replaced with finger notches in edge of drawer faces.
  • Lighted, vanity drawer with mirror and jewelry compartments between hanging lockers eliminated. Replaced by a standard, plain drawer.
  • Double sinks in galley made smaller. 
  • Contoured, full-wrap teak ‘eyebrow’ trim around the outside of the salon roof and the forward cabin roof eliminated. Replaced with straight trim strips on roof sides only.
  • Teak trim around the front and sides of the helm seat eliminated.
  • Flexible duct vent hoses from cabin-top dorades to engine room eliminated (B Plan) with dorades left in place but opening directly into Pullman berth.
  • Engine Room & Bilge blower(s) eliminated but vent cowls on transom left in place.
  • Small overhead locker in Pullman berth eliminated (B-Plan).
  • Padded headboard in Pullman berth eliminated (B-Plan).
  • Propane tank moved from port side aft locker to starboard side aft locker. 
  • Engine instrument panel moved from aft end of port cockpit locker to aft end of starboard cockpit locker.
  • PVC raceway for engine room cable/wiring eliminated. Replaced with zip ties and cable clips.
  • Locker under the breaker panel at Nav. Station eliminated. (This change increased the size of the starboard cockpit locker)
  • Floor hatch at Nav. Station eliminated, reducing access to wiring harness.
  • Floor hatch at Galley eliminated.
  • Three floor hatches between the Pullman berth and hanging lockers reduced to two. The forward and centre ones were combined into a single long skinny hatch that warps & doesn’t lay flat.
  • Keel ballast changed from lead shot to steel shot.
  • Perkins 4-108 went from standard engine to special order. Pathfinder became standard engine.
  • Port side handrail in main cabin eliminated and replaced with a plain trim strip.
  • Cabin floor and floor hatches for engine room access reduced in thickness from 1" to 0.75".
  • Double anchor roller at bow eliminated. Replaced with single roller.
  • Separate port & starboard cap-rail mounted navigation lights eliminated. Replaced with single combo light unit mounted on bow pulpit.
  • New scuppers added at the rear of the side decks to eliminate standing water.
  • Foot pump under sink in head eliminated, head faucets plumbed directly into pressure pump circuit. No easy way to get water to head if electric pump fails.
  • Fuel tank capacity reduced from approx. 80 gal to approx. 50 gal to help address problems of ‘stern squat’ when loaded. (We understand that the earlier boats addressed the same problem through additional lead ingot ballast in the bow)   
The items listed are the most significant ones we have encountered during our various projects to date. There are likely other less obvious ones and we will amend the list as and when we find them.